1. Botanical name

Gymnema sylvestre R. Br.

2. Synonym(s)

Periploca sylvestris Retz.

3. Family

Asclepiadaceae

4. Taxonomic status

Species

5. Vernacular names

Gurmar, Merasingi

6. Habit

Large climber

7. Habitat

In Sal and mixed deciduous forests

8. Original global distribution

Paleotropic

9. Current

regional

distribution

 

Chhattisgarh

Bastar, Sarguja, Bilaspur, Raipur

Madhya Pradesh

Betul, Chattarpur, Damon, Hoshangabad, Khandwa, Jabalpur, Narsimhapur, Rewa, Satar, Sehore

10. Elevation range (m)

Up to 450

11. Population Reduction – PR

 

States

< 30%

30 to 49%

50 to < 80%

­³ 80%

Chhattisgarh

ü

 

 

 

Madhya Pradesh

ü

 

 

 

Data quality

2, 4

11 a. Time/Rate (years/generations)

10 years

12. Extent of Occurrence – EOO

>20,000Km2

13. Area of Occupancy – AOO

>2,000Km2

14. No. of  locations / sub-populations 

Chhattisgarh

Madhya Pradesh

5

13

14 a. Data quality

2, 4

15. Threats

Ov (Over harvesting), Hm (Harvest for medicine), T (Trade), Sf (Fire)

 Lf (Loss of Habitat - Fragmentation), Lp (Loss of habitat – Quality),

16. Trade

 

Name(s)

 

Level(s)

Local ü

Regional ü

National ü

Global ü

Parts traded

Whole plant

Effect on population

Declining

Data quality

3, 4

17. Other comments

·          This species have good trade

·          Used in anti-diabetic medicines

18. Recent field studies

·  Tiwari, R.K.S & S.S. Chandrawanshi, 2003. “Technical bulletin on medicinal plants cultivation and uses”. IGAU

·  Bhattacharya, P. 2003. “Training manual on medicinal plants – strategies for conservation practices”. IIFM, Bhopal

19. Status

Chhattisgarh

Madhya Pradesh

- CITES

-

- Legislation

-

- Criteria based on

VU (A 2 c, d)

VU (A 2 c, d)

- IUCN

VU

VU

20. % of global presence

1 %

1 %

21. Existing Conservation measures

In situ conservation in Peoples Protected Area

22. Is the presence of taxon continuous with neighbouring areas ?

Yes

23. Are the outside populations also under similar threats / pressures?

Yes

24. Recommendations

-

Research / Management

a) in situ

In RDF W.C. multi tier plantations

b) ex situ

 

   i) Cultivation

3

   ii) Level of difficulty in propagation / cultivation

3 (Very difficult), Propagation is difficult, only 25% success

25. Existing cultivation-

Experimental trials have been made (nearly 20 acres) in Chhattisgarh

26. Previous assessment

-

27. Data sources

(Including literature)

·          Mudgal, V., K. K. Khanna & P.K. Hajra, 1977. Flora of Madhya Pradesh. Vol. II; B.S.I

·          Verma, D.M., P.C. Pant & M.I. Hanfi, 1985. Flora of Raipur, Durg & Rajnandgaon; B.S.I

·          K.K. Khanna, A. Kumar, R.D. Dixit & N.P. Singh, 2001. Supplement to the flora of Madhya Pradesh; B.S.I

·          Murti, S. K. & G. Panigrahi, 1999. Flora of Bilaspur District.

·          Dr. Boaz, 1998. Adivasi uthaan’s laghu vanopaj

·          Roy, G.P., B.K. Shukla, B. Dutt, 1992. Flora of Madhya Pradesh, Chhattarpur & Damoh

28. Compilers

Ajay K. Awasthi, Arvind Anil Boaz (Facilitator), P. Bhattacharya,

Brajesh Kumar Sahu, S.S. Chandravanshi, Krishna Patra (Recorder),

G. A. Kinhal, Pankaj Oudhia, Vinay K. Sinha

29. Reviewers

Plenary