|
1. Botanical name |
Corallocarpus epigaeus (Rottl. & Willd.) Clarke Roxb. |
|||||||
|
2. Synonym(s) |
Bryonia
epigaea
Rottl. & Willd. |
|||||||
|
3. Family |
Cucurbitaceae
|
|||||||
|
4. Taxonomic status |
Species |
|||||||
|
5. Vernacular names |
Akasgaddah,
rakasgaddah (H) |
|||||||
|
6. Habit |
Climber
|
|||||||
|
7. Habitat |
Dry
deciduous forests |
|||||||
|
8. Original global distribution |
India
|
|||||||
|
9. Current regional distribution |
Chhattisgarh |
- |
||||||
|
Madhya
Pradesh |
Shivpuri
|
|||||||
|
10. Elevation range (m) |
300
– 900 |
|||||||
|
11. Population
Reduction – PR
|
States
|
<
30% |
30
to 49% |
50
to < 80% |
³
80% |
|||
|
Chhattisgarh |
|
|
ü |
|
||||
|
Madhya
Pradesh |
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Data quality |
2,
3, 4
|
|||||||
|
11 a. Time/Rate (years/generations) |
3
gnerations |
|||||||
|
12. Extent of Occurrence –
EOO |
>20,000Km2
|
|||||||
|
13. Area of Occupancy –
AOO |
>2,000Km2 |
|||||||
|
14. No. of locations / sub-populations |
Chhattisgarh |
Madhya Pradesh |
||||||
|
- |
One |
|||||||
|
14 a. Data quality |
2,
3, 4
|
|||||||
|
15. Threats |
Lf
(Loss of Habitat - Fragmentation) |
|||||||
|
16. Trade |
Name(s) |
|
||||||
|
Level(s) |
Local
|
Regional
ü |
National
|
Global
|
||||
|
Parts
traded |
|
|||||||
|
Effect
on population |
Declining |
|||||||
|
Data
quality |
2,
3, 4
|
|||||||
|
17. Other comments |
It
is not reported in flora of Madhya Pradesh but collected from Shivpuri Dt. |
|||||||
|
18. Recent field studies |
Dr. Roma Mitra, NBRI |
|||||||
19. Status |
Chhattisgarh |
Madhya Pradesh |
||||||
|
- CITES |
- |
|||||||
|
- Legislation |
- |
|||||||
|
- Criteria
based on |
- |
EN
(A 2 c, d) |
||||||
|
- IUCN |
- |
EN |
||||||
|
20. % of global presence |
|
1 % |
||||||
|
21. Existing Conservation measures |
No
|
|||||||
|
22. Is the presence of taxon
continuous with neighbouring areas ? |
No
|
|||||||
|
23. Are the outside
populations also under similar threats / pressures? |
No
|
|||||||
|
24. Recommendations |
S
(Survey, search and find), M (Monitoring) |
|||||||
|
Research / Management |
||||||||
|
a) in situ |
Shivpuri
|
|||||||
|
b) ex situ |
- |
|||||||
|
i)
Cultivation |
- |
|||||||
|
ii)
Level of difficulty in propagation / cultivation |
2
(Moderately difficult) |
|||||||
|
25. Existing cultivation- |
- |
|||||||
|
26. Previous assessment |
- |
|||||||
|
27. Data sources (Including literature) |
Dr.
R.L.S. Sikarwar & R.M. Painuli - Ethno botanical importance of family
Cucurbitaceae of Madhya Pradesh Dr.
Roma Mitra, NBRI |
|||||||
|
28. Compilers |
Dr.
R.L.S. Sikarwar, Shahbaz Ahmad, Dr.
U.K. Subuddhi, Dr.
A.K. Jain, Ms Arti Gupta, Dr. J.L. Srivastava, N. Mohan Karnat, Ashutosh
Tripathi, K. Ravikumar, Dr. R. Gupta, Dr. S.S. Bisen |
|||||||
|
29. Reviewers |
Plenary |
|||||||