|
1. Botanical name |
Fritillaria roylei Hook. |
|||||||||||
|
2. Synonym(s) |
- |
|||||||||||
|
3. Family |
Liliaceae
|
|||||||||||
|
4. Taxonomic status |
Species |
|||||||||||
|
5. Vernacular names |
Salam
Mishari (Kullu) |
|||||||||||
|
6. Habit |
Perennial
Herb |
|||||||||||
|
7. Habitat |
Sub-Alpine
/Alpine slopes/ Meadows, shrubberies, boulders. |
|||||||||||
|
8. Original global distribution |
India,
Pakistan |
|||||||||||
|
9. Current regional distribution |
Himachal Pradesh |
Chhajpur
(Shimla), Gulaba (Kullu), Churdhar |
||||||||||
|
Jammu & Kashmir |
Poonch,
Rupri, Kailash, Synthen |
|||||||||||
|
Uttaranchal |
Valley of flowers, Gangotri, Kush kalyan,
Milam etc. |
|||||||||||
|
10. Elevation range (m) |
2,800
– 4,000 |
|||||||||||
|
11. Population
Reduction – PR |
States
|
< 30% |
30 to 49% |
50 to < 80% |
³ 80% |
|||||||
|
Himachal Pradesh |
|
|
ü |
|
||||||||
|
Jammu & Kashmir |
|
|
ü |
|
||||||||
|
Uttaranchal |
|
|
|
ü |
||||||||
|
Data quality |
2,
3, 4
|
|||||||||||
|
11 a. Time/Rate
(years/generations) |
10
years |
|||||||||||
|
12. Extent of Occurrence –
EOO |
>5,000 - <20, 000 Km2
|
|||||||||||
|
13. Area of Occupancy –
AOO |
> 500; <2,000 Km2
|
|||||||||||
|
14. No. of locations / sub-populations |
Himachal Pradesh |
Jammu
& Kashmir |
Uttaranchal |
|||||||||
|
10 |
3 |
10 |
||||||||||
|
14 a. Data quality |
2,
3
|
|||||||||||
|
15. Threats |
L
(Loss of Habitat), Hm (Harvest for medicine), T (Trade) |
|||||||||||
|
16. Trade |
Name(s) |
Kshir
Kak
|
||||||||||
|
Level(s) |
Local
ü |
Regional
ü |
National
ü |
Global
|
||||||||
|
Parts traded |
Bulb
|
|||||||||||
|
Effect on population |
Declining |
|||||||||||
|
Data quality |
2, 3, 4 |
|||||||||||
|
17. Other comments |
·
Used in Ashtavarga (a combination of 8 rejuvinating drugs in
preparation of the famous Ayurvaedic tonic – Chyavanprash) |
|||||||||||
|
18. Recent field studies |
UHF,
Solan (HP); GHNP, Kullu; S.K. Singh, 1998 |
|||||||||||
|
19. Status |
Himachal Pradesh |
Jammu & Kashmir |
Uttaranchal |
|||||||||
|
- CITES |
- |
|||||||||||
|
-
Legislation |
- |
|||||||||||
|
- Criteria
based on |
EN (A
2 c, d) |
EN (A
2 c, d) |
CR (A
2 c, d; B1 a, b, ii, iii; B 2 a, b, ii, iii) |
|||||||||
|
- IUCN |
EN (G) |
|||||||||||
|
20. % of global presence |
60 – 70 % |
|||||||||||
|
21. Existing Conservation
measures |
-
|
|||||||||||
|
22. Is the presence of taxon
continuous with neighbouring areas ? |
Yes
|
|||||||||||
|
23. Are the outside
populations also under similar threats / pressures? |
Yes
|
|||||||||||
|
24. Recommendations |
S (Survey), Hm (Habitat management), M (Monitoring),
Lh (Life history studies) |
|||||||||||
|
Research /
Management |
||||||||||||
|
a) in situ |
HP
– Chajpur (Shimla), Rahla (Kullu) UA
– Valley of flowers, Tungnath (Chamoli Dt.) |
|||||||||||
|
b) ex situ |
- |
|||||||||||
|
i) Cultivation |
- |
|||||||||||
|
ii) Level of difficulty in propagation /
cultivation |
3
(very difficult) |
|||||||||||
|
25. Existing cultivation- |
- |
|||||||||||
|
26. Previous assessment |
CR-JMK,
EN-HP (Kullu CAMP) |
|||||||||||
|
27. Data sources (Including
literature) |
- |
|||||||||||
|
28. Compilers |
R. D. Gaur (Facilitator), G. S. Rawat (Recorder),
S. Chandola, A. R. Nautiyal, P. P. Bhojvaid, K. Ravikumar, Utkarsh Ghate |
|||||||||||
|
29. Reviewers |
Rekha Naithani, N.K. Bhardwaj, Kailash Sharma, R.
K. Verma, Vaneet Jishtu, Rajender Kumar, Ranjit Rawat, N. S. Chauhan, Vinay
Tandon, H. K. Badola |
|||||||||||