1. Botanical name |
Gloriosa superba L. |
|||||||
2. Synonym(s) |
Methonia
superba Lamk. |
|||||||
3. Family |
Liliaceae
|
|||||||
4. Taxonomic status |
Species |
|||||||
5. Vernacular names |
Kalihari,
Karkari, Langali, Glory lily |
|||||||
6. Habit |
Climbing
herb |
|||||||
7. Habitat |
|
|||||||
8. Original global distribution |
Through
out tropical Africa and Asia |
|||||||
9. Current regional distribution |
Chhattisgarh |
Bastar,
Dantewada, Kankar, Dhamtari, Sarguja, Bilaspur, Raigarh, Jaspur |
||||||
Madhya
Pradesh |
Hoshangabad,
Burharpur, Baitool, Moist districts |
|||||||
10. Elevation range (m) |
280
- 500 |
|||||||
11. Population
Reduction – PR
|
States
|
<
30% |
30
to 49% |
50
to < 80% |
³
80% |
|||
Chhattisgarh |
|
ü |
|
|
||||
Madhya
Pradesh |
|
ü |
|
|
||||
Data quality |
2,
3, 4
|
|||||||
11 a. Time/Rate (years/generations) |
10
years |
|||||||
12. Extent of Occurrence –
EOO |
>5,000Km2
|
|||||||
13. Area of Occupancy –
AOO |
>2,000Km2 |
|||||||
14. No. of locations /
sub-populations |
Chhattisgarh |
Madhya Pradesh |
||||||
25 |
18 |
|||||||
14 a. Data quality |
2,
3, 4
|
|||||||
15. Threats |
Hm
(Harvest for medicine), L (Loss of Habitat), Sd (Draught), Sf
(Fire), T (Trade) |
|||||||
16. Trade |
Name(s) |
Kaliyari,
Kalihari, Langali (S)
|
||||||
Level(s) |
Local
ü |
Regional
ü |
National
ü |
Global
ü |
||||
Parts
traded |
Rhizome,
seed
|
|||||||
Effect
on population |
Declining
(10 % decrease in last 10 years ; 20% decrease expected in next 10 years) |
|||||||
Data
quality |
2,
3, 4
|
|||||||
17. Other comments |
- |
|||||||
18. Recent field studies |
A.K. Bhattacharya & Krishna Patra – MPMFP Federation
publication Oudhia, P. 2003. www. botanical .com |
|||||||
19. Status |
Chhattisgarh |
Madhya Pradesh |
||||||
- CITES |
- |
|||||||
- Legislation |
- |
|||||||
- Criteria
based on |
VU
(A 2 c, d) |
VU
(A 2 c, d) |
||||||
- IUCN |
VU |
VU |
||||||
20. % of global presence |
< 1 % |
|||||||
21. Existing Conservation measures |
CG
– Nagari, up to 10 ha
MP – No substantial cultivation |
|||||||
22. Is the presence of
taxon continuous with neighbouring areas ? |
Yes
|
|||||||
23. Are the outside
populations also under similar threats / pressures? |
Yes
|
|||||||
24. Recommendations |
Hm
(Habitat management), S (Survey, search and find), M
(Monitoring) |
|||||||
Research / Management |
||||||||
a) in situ |
- |
|||||||
b) ex situ |
- |
|||||||
i)
Cultivation |
3 |
|||||||
ii)
Level of difficulty in propagation / cultivation |
1
(Least difficult) |
|||||||
25. Existing cultivation- |
In
practice in Chhattisgarh plains |
|||||||
26. Previous assessment |
- |
|||||||
27. Data sources (Including literature) |
A.K. Bhattacharya & Krishna Patra – MPMFP
Federation publication |
|||||||
28. Compilers |
Anjali Rawat (Recorder), A. K.
Bhattacharya, S. J. Chipde, D. K. Ved K. K.
Khanna, A. K. Kulshrestha, Manish Mishra, Suprava Patnaik, Manisha Alice Lakra, Nagar, T. R. Sahu
(Facilitator), B. Saluja |
|||||||
29. Reviewers |
Ajay K. Awasthi, Arvind Anil Boaz, P.
Bhattacharya, Pankaj Oudhia, Brajesh Kumar Sahu, Krishna Patra,
G.A. Kinhal, Vinay K. Sinha, S. S. Chandravanshi |
|||||||