1. Botanical name |
Oroxylum indicum (L.) Vent |
|||||||
2. Synonym(s) |
Calosanthes
indica
Blume |
|||||||
3. Family |
Bignoniaceae
|
|||||||
4. Taxonomic status |
Species |
|||||||
5. Vernacular names |
Shynak
|
|||||||
6. Habit |
Tree
|
|||||||
7. Habitat |
Tropical
deciduous forest |
|||||||
8. Original global distribution |
India
|
|||||||
9. Current regional distribution |
Chhattisgarh |
Widely
distributed |
||||||
Madhya
Pradesh |
Widely
distributed |
|||||||
10. Elevation range (m) |
300
– 900 |
|||||||
11. Population
Reduction – PR
|
States
|
<
30% |
30
to 49% |
50
to < 80% |
³
80% |
|||
Chhattisgarh |
|
ü |
|
|
||||
Madhya
Pradesh |
|
ü |
|
|
||||
Data quality |
3,
4
|
|||||||
11 a. Time/Rate (years/generations) |
3
generations |
|||||||
12. Extent of Occurrence –
EOO |
>20,000Km2
|
|||||||
13. Area of Occupancy –
AOO |
>2,000Km2 |
|||||||
14. No. of locations / sub-populations |
Chhattisgarh |
Madhya Pradesh |
||||||
Many |
Many |
|||||||
14 a. Data quality |
3,
4
|
|||||||
15. Threats |
Hm
(Harvest for medicine), Tp (Traded for parts) |
|||||||
16. Trade |
Name(s) |
Shyonak
|
||||||
Level(s) |
Local
ü |
Regional
ü |
National
ü |
Global
|
||||
Parts
traded |
Root,
Bark
|
|||||||
Effect
on population |
Declining |
|||||||
Data
quality |
3,
4
|
|||||||
17. Other comments |
Bark
is unscientifically harvested with out considering immature plants |
|||||||
18. Recent field studies |
Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Govt. of
India, DISM & H, WHO, 2001-2002 |
|||||||
19. Status |
Chhattisgarh |
Madhya Pradesh |
||||||
- CITES |
- |
|||||||
- Legislation |
- |
|||||||
- Criteria
based on |
VU
(A 2 c, d) |
VU
(A 2 c, d) |
||||||
- IUCN |
VU |
VU |
||||||
20. % of global presence |
< 1 % |
< 1 % |
||||||
21. Existing Conservation measures |
-
|
|||||||
22. Is the presence of
taxon continuous with neighbouring areas ? |
Yes
|
|||||||
23. Are the outside
populations also under similar threats / pressures? |
Yes
|
|||||||
24. Recommendations |
Multiplication,
Sustainable harvesting |
|||||||
Research / Management |
||||||||
a) in situ |
CG
– Kanger MP
– Bhopalpatnam, Dantewada |
|||||||
b) ex situ |
- |
|||||||
i)
Cultivation |
- |
|||||||
ii)
Level of difficulty in propagation / cultivation |
2
(Moderately difficult) |
|||||||
25. Existing cultivation- |
- |
|||||||
26. Previous assessment |
|
|||||||
27. Data sources (Including literature) |
Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Govt. of
India, DISM & H, WHO, 2001-2002 |
|||||||
28. Compilers |
S. N. Khotele (Facilitator), Omkar Lal
Shrivastava, R. K. Pandey, Pushp Jain, Ruby Sharma, J. P. Sharma, Shweta Singh
(Recorder), R. K. S. Tiwari, R. Vijaya Sankar, Vinay
Tandon |
|||||||
29. Reviewers |
Ajay K. Awasthi, Arvind Anil Boaz, P.
Bhattacharya, Pankaj Oudhia, Brajesh Kumar Sahu, Krishna Patra,
G.A. Kinhal, Vinay K. Sinha, S. S. Chandravanshi |
|||||||