1. Botanical name |
Paris polyphylla Smith |
||||||||||
2. Synonym(s) |
P.
polyphylla ssp. polyphylla var. wallichii Hara
in ohashi (Naithani, 1990). |
||||||||||
3. Family |
Liliaceae
|
||||||||||
4. Taxonomic status |
Species |
||||||||||
5. Vernacular names |
Nag-chhatri,
Meethi bach |
||||||||||
6. Habit |
Perennial
herb |
||||||||||
7. Habitat |
Moist
shady temperate forests with high humus |
||||||||||
8. Original global distribution |
Pakistan
to S.W. China, also in N.E. India |
||||||||||
9. Current regional distribution |
Himachal
Pradesh |
Shimla,
rupibhoba, Kullu, Chamba |
|||||||||
Jammu
& Kashmir |
Poonch,
Bhaderwati, Pir Panchal |
||||||||||
Uttaranchal |
Uttarkashi,
valley of flowers, Ralam, Dodital |
||||||||||
10. Elevation range (m) |
1,800
– 3, 000 |
||||||||||
11. Population
Reduction – PR
|
States
|
<
30% |
30
to 49% |
50
to < 80% |
³
80% |
||||||
Himachal
Pradesh |
|
|
ü |
|
|||||||
Jammu
& Kashmir |
|
|
ü |
|
|||||||
Uttaranchal |
|
|
ü |
|
|||||||
Data quality |
3
|
||||||||||
11 a. Time/Rate (years/generations) |
10
years |
||||||||||
12. Extent of Occurrence –
EOO |
> 20,000 Km2
|
||||||||||
13. Area of Occupancy –
AOO |
< 500 Km2 |
||||||||||
14. No. of locations / sub-populations |
Himachal Pradesh |
Jammu
& Kashmir |
Uttaranchal |
||||||||
5 |
3 |
10 |
|||||||||
14 a. Data quality |
2,
3
|
||||||||||
15. Threats |
L
(Habitat loss and fragmentation), H (Harvesting) |
||||||||||
16. Trade |
Name(s) |
Meethi
bach. Safed bach, Dudh bach
|
|||||||||
Level(s) |
Local
ü |
Regional
ü |
National
|
Global
|
|||||||
Parts
traded |
Rhizome
|
||||||||||
Effect
on population |
Declining |
||||||||||
Data
quality |
3 |
||||||||||
17. Other comments |
§
Sometimes used as substitute for Lilium polyphyllum §
S. Chandola has established a germplasm bank at Nald village
in Uttarkashi |
||||||||||
18. Recent field studies |
§
Goraya et.al. 2000-2002 §
O.P Sharma, 1991. J&K §
H.S. Kiran, 1990 §
Y.K. Sarin, 1982 |
||||||||||
19. Status |
Himachal Pradesh |
Jammu & Kashmir |
Uttaranchal |
||||||||
- CITES
|
- |
||||||||||
- Legislation |
- |
||||||||||
- Criteria
based on |
EN (A 2 c, d) |
EN (A 2 c, d) |
EN (A 2 c, d) |
||||||||
- IUCN |
EN |
EN |
EN |
||||||||
20. % of global presence |
2 – 5% |
2 – 5% |
2% |
||||||||
21. Existing Conservation measures |
Nil
|
||||||||||
22. Is the presence of taxon
continuous with neighbouring areas ? |
Yes
|
||||||||||
23. Are the outside
populations also under similar threats / pressures ? |
Yes
|
||||||||||
24. Recommendations |
S
(Survey, search and find), M (Monitoring) |
||||||||||
Research / Management |
|
||||||||||
a) in situ |
Addu
- Nankhoa |
||||||||||
b) ex situ |
Agro-technology
to be standardized |
||||||||||
i)
Cultivation |
Not
attempted |
||||||||||
ii)
Level of difficulty in propagation / cultivation |
|
||||||||||
25. Existing cultivation- |
Nil |
||||||||||
26. Previous assessment |
Nil |
||||||||||
27. Data sources (Including literature) |
Regional
floras |
||||||||||
28. Compilers |
G.S.
Goraya (Facilitator), Subhash Rana, Dr. Nag, K.S. Kapoor, S.P. Subramani
(Recorder), Surinder Kumar, Darshan Shankar, Mrs. Shashi Sharma, Sanjeeva
Pandey |
||||||||||
29. Reviewers |
R.
D. Gaur, G. S. Rawat, S. Chandola, A. R. Nautiyal, P. P. Bhojvaid, K.
Ravikumar, Utkarsh Ghate |
||||||||||