1. Botanical name |
Podophyllum hexandrum Royle |
||||||||||
2. Synonym(s) |
Podophyllum emodi Wall. ex Hook.f.
& Thoms. |
||||||||||
3. Family |
Podophyllaceae |
||||||||||
4. Taxonomic status |
Species
|
||||||||||
5. Vernacular names |
Bankari, Galakada, Shathjalapari |
||||||||||
6. Habit |
Herb
with perennial rootstock |
||||||||||
7. Habitat |
Alpine
to temperate regions. Moist shady places with humus soil. |
||||||||||
8.
Original global distribution |
Afghanistan,
Pakistan, India, Nepal, Bhutan, S.W.China, Myanmar |
||||||||||
9. Current regional distribution |
Himachal Pradesh |
Dhamrera
(Rohru), Pangi, Chamba, Kinnaur, Kullu, Churdha |
|||||||||
Jammu & Kashmir |
Jai,
Tungmarg, Santhal |
||||||||||
Uttaranchal |
Kedarnath,
Haekdoon, Kuari pass, Valley of flowers, Pamvali, Ralam, Khatling, Milam,
Darma, Byans, Dodital |
||||||||||
10. Elevation range (m) |
Up
to 4,000 |
||||||||||
11. Population
Reduction – PR |
States
|
<
30% |
30
to <49% |
50
to < 80% |
³
80% |
||||||
Himachal Pradesh |
|
|
ü |
|
|||||||
Jammu & Kashmir |
|
|
ü |
|
|||||||
Uttaranchal |
|
|
ü |
|
|||||||
Data quality |
2,
3
|
||||||||||
11 a. Time/Rate
(years/generations) |
10
years |
||||||||||
12. Extent of Occurrence –
EOO |
>20, 000 Km2
|
||||||||||
13. Area of Occupancy –
AOO |
> 2,000 Km2 |
||||||||||
14. No. of locations / sub-populations |
Himachal Pradesh |
Jammu
& Kashmir |
Uttaranchal |
||||||||
Many |
|
Many |
|||||||||
14 a. Data quality |
3
|
||||||||||
15. Threats |
Hm
(Harvest for medicine), Lf (Loss of Habitat - Fragmentation), Tp
(Traded for parts), Lp (Loss of habitat – Quality) |
||||||||||
16. Trade |
Name(s) |
Bankakri
|
|||||||||
Level(s) |
Local
ü |
Regional
ü |
National
|
Global
|
|||||||
Parts traded |
Rhizome
& Roots
|
||||||||||
Effect on population |
Declining
|
||||||||||
Data quality |
3 |
||||||||||
17. Other comments |
·
Poor natural regeneration due to seed dormancy (HPU, 2002) ·
Roots anti cancerous; P.
auranticole is often mixed with & traded |
||||||||||
18. Recent field studies |
·
Field observations by HFRI at Rupibhaba, Sangla (2002) ·
Field observations by ISM, Jogindernagar, at Dhamrera, Sural (Pangi),
2002 ·
Dr. N.S. Chauhan; Dr. H.K. Bodola; Mr. Sanjay K. Singh: ·
Mr. C.P.Kala; Uniyal et.al.2002 (WII), ·
HAPPRC; FRI |
||||||||||
19.
Status |
Himachal Pradesh |
Jammu & Kashmir |
Uttaranchal |
||||||||
- CITES |
Appendix
II |
||||||||||
- Legislation |
Negative
list of Exports, 1998 |
||||||||||
- Criteria based on |
EN
(A 2 c, d) |
EN
(A 2 c, d) |
EN
(A 2 c, d) |
||||||||
- IUCN |
EN |
EN |
EN |
||||||||
20.
% of global presence |
5% |
10% |
5% |
||||||||
21.
Existing Conservation measures |
· Enrichment
planting being undertaken in the degraded forests
· Vanaspati vans |
||||||||||
22.
Is the presence of taxon continuous with neighbouring areas ? |
Yes
|
||||||||||
23.
Are the outside populations also under similar threats / pressures? |
Yes
|
||||||||||
24.
Recommendations |
Hm (Habitat management), S (Survey, search &
find), M (Monitoring) |
||||||||||
Research / Management |
|||||||||||
a) in situ |
JK
– Jai, Tungmarg, Santhal HP
– Dhotithal (Chakratha hills) Uttaranchal
– Parvati valley |
||||||||||
b) ex situ |
Seed
banks to be established |
||||||||||
i) Cultivation |
- |
||||||||||
ii) Level of difficulty in propagation / cultivation |
3
(Very difficult) |
||||||||||
25.
Existing cultivation- |
Under
Vanspati vans scheme |
||||||||||
26.
Previous assessment |
EN
(Kullu CAMP) |
||||||||||
27.
Data sources (Including
literature) |
· N.S. Chauhan, 1994, Herbal
wealth of Lahaul and Spiti, Souvenir, Tribal fair, Keylong · Singh & Rawat G.S.,
1998, Long term monitoring of vegetation GHNP, Kullu |
||||||||||
28.
Compilers |
R. D. Gaur (Facilitator), G. S. Rawat (Recorder),
S. Chandola, A. R. Nautiyal, P. P. Bhojvaid, K. Ravikumar,
Utkarsh Ghate |
||||||||||
29.
Reviewers |
G.S.
Goraya, Subhash Rana, D.r. Nag, S.P. Subramani, Sanjeeva Pandey, Surinder
Kumar, K.S. Kapoor Mrs. Shashi Sharma, Darshan Shankar |
||||||||||