|
1. Botanical name |
Pterocarpus marsupium Roxb. |
|||||||
|
2. Synonym(s) |
- |
|||||||
|
3. Family |
Fabaceae
|
|||||||
|
4. Taxonomic status |
Species |
|||||||
|
5. Vernacular names |
Bijasal,
Bija, Pharri |
|||||||
|
6. Habit |
Tree |
|||||||
|
7. Habitat |
Tropica
dry deciduous forests |
|||||||
|
8. Original global distribution |
Peninsula and S. India. |
|||||||
|
9. Current regional distribution |
Chhattisgarh |
All
over the state |
||||||
|
Madhya
Pradesh |
All
over the state |
|||||||
|
10. Elevation range (m) |
700
– 1,500 |
|||||||
|
11. Population
Reduction – PR
|
States
|
<
30% |
30
to 49% |
50
to < 80% |
³
80% |
|||
|
Chhattisgarh |
|
ü |
|
|
||||
|
Madhya
Pradesh |
|
ü |
|
|
||||
|
Data quality |
1,
3
|
|||||||
|
11 a. Time/Rate (years/generations) |
10
years |
|||||||
|
12. Extent of Occurrence –
EOO |
>20,000Km2
|
|||||||
|
13. Area of Occupancy –
AOO |
>2,000Km2 |
|||||||
|
14. No. of locations / sub-populations |
Chhattisgarh |
Madhya Pradesh |
||||||
|
- |
- |
|||||||
|
14 a. Data quality |
1,
3
|
|||||||
|
15. Threats |
E
(Edaphic factors), Hm (Harvest for medicine), L (Loss of Habitat), Tp (Traded
for parts), Sf (Fire) |
|||||||
|
16. Trade |
Name(s) |
Bija
|
||||||
|
Level(s) |
Local
ü |
Regional
ü |
National
ü |
Global
ü |
||||
|
Parts
traded |
Wood,
Gum
|
|||||||
|
Effect
on population |
Declining |
|||||||
|
Data
quality |
1,
3
|
|||||||
|
17. Other comments |
- |
|||||||
|
18. Recent field studies |
R.K. Pandey et.al. . 1992-2000. Project
report |
|||||||
|
19. Status |
Chhattisgarh |
Madhya Pradesh |
||||||
|
- CITES |
- |
|||||||
|
- Legislation |
Nationalised
timber – (IFA 1927) |
|||||||
|
- Criteria
based on |
VU
(A 2 c, d) |
VU
(A 2 c, d) |
||||||
|
- IUCN |
VU |
VU |
||||||
|
20. % of global presence |
10-15 % |
|||||||
|
21. Existing Conservation measures |
-
|
|||||||
|
22. Is the presence of
taxon continuous with neighbouring areas ? |
Yes
|
|||||||
|
23. Are the outside
populations also under similar threats / pressures? |
-
|
|||||||
|
24. Recommendations |
Seed
biology, Regeneration studies, Studies on biotic impact |
|||||||
|
Research / Management |
||||||||
|
a) in situ |
- |
|||||||
|
b) ex situ |
- |
|||||||
|
i)
Cultivation |
- |
|||||||
|
ii)
Level of difficulty in propagation / cultivation |
3
(Highly difficult) |
|||||||
|
25. Existing cultivation- |
- |
|||||||
|
26. Previous assessment |
- |
|||||||
|
27. Data sources (Including literature) |
- |
|||||||
|
28. Compilers |
S. N. Khotele, Omkar Lal Shrivastava, R.
K. Pandey, Pushp Jain, Ruby Sharma, J. P. Sharma, Shweta Singh,
R. Vijaya Sankar, R. K. S. Tiwari, Vinay Tandon |
|||||||
|
29. Reviewers |
Ajay K. Awasthi, Arvind Anil Boaz, P.
Bhattacharya, Pankaj Oudhia, Brajesh Kumar Sahu, Krishna Patra,
G.A. Kinhal, Vinay K. Sinha, S. S. Chandravanshi |
|||||||