1. Botanical name |
Rubia cordifolia L. |
|||||||
2. Synonym(s) |
Rubia
cordifolia var.
manjista (Roxb.) Miq. |
|||||||
3. Family |
Rubiaceae
|
|||||||
4. Taxonomic status |
Species |
|||||||
5. Vernacular names |
Munjeeth,
Kusheer, Pilio |
|||||||
6. Habit |
Herb
|
|||||||
7. Habitat |
Mixed
forests |
|||||||
8. Original global distribution |
Africa,
Asia and Australia |
|||||||
9. Current regional distribution |
Chhattisgarh |
Bastar |
||||||
Madhya
Pradesh |
Amarkantak |
|||||||
10. Elevation range (m) |
1,000
– 1,500 |
|||||||
11. Population
Reduction – PR
|
States
|
<
30% |
30
to 49% |
50
to < 80% |
³
80% |
|||
Chhattisgarh |
|
ü |
|
|
||||
Madhya
Pradesh |
|
ü |
|
|
||||
Data quality |
3,
4
|
|||||||
11 a. Time/Rate (years/generations) |
10
years |
|||||||
12. Extent of Occurrence –
EOO |
> 20,000Km2
|
|||||||
13. Area of Occupancy –
AOO |
> 2,000Km2 |
|||||||
14. No. of locations / sub-populations |
Chhattisgarh |
Madhya Pradesh |
||||||
Many |
Many |
|||||||
14 a. Data quality |
3,
4
|
|||||||
15. Threats |
Hm
(Harvest for medicine), L (Loss of Habitat), Tp (Traded for parts) |
|||||||
16. Trade |
Name(s) |
Manjeeth,
Pilia
|
||||||
Level(s) |
Local
ü |
Regional
ü |
National
ü |
Global
|
||||
Parts
traded |
Root
|
|||||||
Effect
on population |
Declining |
|||||||
Data
quality |
3,
4
|
|||||||
17. Other comments |
·
Excessive exploitation of roots · Rubia cordifolia is a complex group
distributed in Africa, Asis and Australia. Rubia manjith Roxb. ex
Flem. is a distinct race restricted to Eastern Himalaya (Wealth of Asia,
1994). Therefore, the occurance of Rubia manjith in MP & CG is
ruled out. Hence, the species considered for assessment is Rubia
cordifolia L. sensu. Hook. f. |
|||||||
18. Recent field studies |
R.K. Pandey, 1998-2002. SFRI |
|||||||
19. Status |
Chhattisgarh |
Madhya Pradesh |
||||||
- CITES |
- |
|||||||
- Legislation |
- |
|||||||
- Criteria
based on |
VU (A 2 c, d) |
VU (A 2 c, d) |
||||||
- IUCN |
VU |
VU |
||||||
20. % of global presence |
< 1 % |
< 1 % |
||||||
21. Existing Conservation measures |
-
|
|||||||
22. Is the presence of
taxon continuous with neighbouring areas ? |
Yes
|
|||||||
23. Are the outside
populations also under similar threats / pressures? |
Yes
|
|||||||
24. Recommendations |
Seed
biology, Propagation techniques in ex situ, Protection, Reduction in destructive
harvesting, |
|||||||
Research / Management |
||||||||
a) in situ |
|
|||||||
b) ex situ |
Conservation
in ex situ through development of
gene banks |
|||||||
i)
Cultivation |
- |
|||||||
ii)
Level of difficulty in propagation / cultivation |
3
(Very difficult) |
|||||||
25. Existing cultivation- |
- |
|||||||
26. Previous assessment |
|
|||||||
27. Data sources (Including literature) |
R.K. Pandey, 1998-2002. SFRI |
|||||||
28. Compilers |
S. N. Khotele (Facilitator), Omkar Lal
Shrivastava, R. K. Pandey, Pushp Jain, Ruby Sharma, J. P. Sharma,
Shweta Singh (Recorder), R. K. S. Tiwari, R. Vijaya Sankar, Vinay
Tandon |
|||||||
29. Reviewers |
|
|||||||