1. Botanical name |
Andrographis paniculata (Burmf.) Wall. ex Nees |
|||||||
2. Synonym(s) |
|
|||||||
3. Family |
Acanthaceae
|
|||||||
4. Taxonomic status |
Species |
|||||||
5. Vernacular names |
Karuchirayata
Kalmegh, Bhuineem |
|||||||
6. Habit |
Herb |
|||||||
7. Habitat |
Tropical
deciduous forest |
|||||||
8. Original global distribution |
India,
tropical countries |
|||||||
9. Current regional distribution |
Chhattisgarh |
Through
out the state |
||||||
Madhya
Pradesh |
Through
out the state |
|||||||
10. Elevation range (m) |
300
– 900 |
|||||||
11. Population
Reduction – PR
|
States
|
<
30% |
30
to 49% |
50
to < 80% |
³
80% |
|||
Chhattisgarh |
|
ü |
|
|
||||
Madhya
Pradesh |
|
ü |
|
|
||||
Data quality |
3,
4
|
|||||||
11 a. Time/Rate (years/generations) |
10
years |
|||||||
12. Extent of Occurrence –
EOO |
< 20,000Km2
|
|||||||
13. Area of Occupancy –
AOO |
< 2,000Km2 |
|||||||
14. No. of locations / sub-populations |
Chhattisgarh |
Madhya Pradesh |
||||||
Many |
Many |
|||||||
14 a. Data quality |
3,
4
|
|||||||
15. Threats |
E
(Edaphic factors), Hm (Harvest for medicine), T (Trade), Sd
(Drought) |
|||||||
16. Trade |
Name(s) |
Kalmegh
|
||||||
Level(s) |
Local
ü |
Regional
ü |
National
ü |
Global
ü |
||||
Parts
traded |
Whole
plant
|
|||||||
Effect
on population |
Declining |
|||||||
Data
quality |
3,
4
|
|||||||
17. Other comments |
Whole
plant is useful. Therefore sustainable harvest is proposed |
|||||||
18. Recent field studies |
Ministry of Health and Family welfare, Govt. of
India, DISM, WHO Demand study for selected medicinal plants, 2001-2002 |
|||||||
19. Status |
Chhattisgarh |
Madhya Pradesh |
||||||
- CITES |
|
|||||||
- Legislation |
|
|||||||
- Criteria
based on |
VU
(A 2 c, d) |
VU
(A 2 c, d) |
||||||
- IUCN |
VU |
VU |
||||||
20. % of global presence |
<1 % |
|
||||||
21. Existing Conservation measures |
-
|
|||||||
22. Is the presence of
taxon continuous with neighbouring areas ? |
Yes
|
|||||||
23. Are the outside
populations also under similar threats / pressures? |
Yes
|
|||||||
24. Recommendations |
Biotic
impact, Regeneration / Sustainable harvesting technique |
|||||||
Research / Management |
||||||||
a) in situ |
|
|||||||
b) ex situ |
|
|||||||
i)
Cultivation |
Under
trials |
|||||||
ii)
Level of difficulty in propagation / cultivation |
1
(Least difficult) |
|||||||
25. Existing cultivation- |
An
exsitu cultivation by the farmers have been started |
|||||||
26. Previous assessment |
Yes.
Previous CAMP |
|||||||
27. Data sources (Including literature) |
Ministry
of Health and Family Welfare, Govt. Of India, DISM, WHO, 2001-2002 |
|||||||
28. Compilers |
S. N. Khotele (Facilitator), Omkar Lal
Shrivastava, R. K. Pandey, Pushp Jain, Ruby Sharma, J. P. Sharma,
Shweta Singh (Recorder), R. K. S. Tiwari, R. Vijaya Sankar, Vinay
Tandon |
|||||||
29. Reviewers |
Ajay K. Awasthi, Arvind Anil Boaz, P. Bhattacharya,
Pankaj Oudhia, Brajesh Kumar Sahu, Krishna Patra,
G.A. Kinhal, Vinay K. Sinha, S. S. Chandravanshi |
|||||||