|
1. Botanical name |
Strychnos nux-vomica L. |
|||||||
|
2. Synonym(s) |
- |
|||||||
|
3. Family |
Strychnaceae
|
|||||||
|
4. Taxonomic status |
Species |
|||||||
|
5. Vernacular names |
Kuchla,
Azaraqi |
|||||||
|
6. Habit |
Tree |
|||||||
|
7. Habitat |
Moist
deciduous forests |
|||||||
|
8. Original global distribution |
India,
South Asia |
|||||||
|
9. Current regional distribution |
Chhattisgarh |
Bastar,
Dhantewada, Sukma, Narayanpur, Raipur |
||||||
|
Madhya
Pradesh |
- |
|||||||
|
10. Elevation range (m) |
200
– 900 |
|||||||
|
11. Population
Reduction – PR
|
States
|
<
30% |
30
to 49% |
50
to < 80% |
³
80% |
|||
|
Chhattisgarh |
|
ü |
|
|
||||
|
Madhya
Pradesh |
|
- |
|
|
||||
|
Data quality |
3,
4
|
|||||||
|
11 a. Time/Rate (years/generations) |
10
years |
|||||||
|
12. Extent of Occurrence –
EOO |
>20,000Km2
|
|||||||
|
13. Area of Occupancy –
AOO |
>2,000Km2 |
|||||||
|
14. No. of locations / sub-populations |
Chhattisgarh |
Madhya Pradesh |
||||||
|
Few |
|
|||||||
|
14 a. Data quality |
3,
4
|
|||||||
|
15. Threats |
E
(Edaphic factors), Hm (Harvest for medicine), L (Loss of Habitat), Tp (Traded
for parts) |
|||||||
|
16. Trade |
Name(s) |
Kuchla
|
||||||
|
Level(s) |
Local
ü |
Regional
ü |
National
ü |
Global
ü |
||||
|
Parts
traded |
Seeds
|
|||||||
|
Effect
on population |
Declining |
|||||||
|
Data
quality |
3,
4
|
|||||||
|
17. Other comments |
·
Prescribed for nervous disorders ·
Medicated product for scap ·
Not reported from Madhya Pradesh, recorded only from Chhattisgarh
state (Raipur) and is stated to be a Rare plant |
|||||||
|
18. Recent field studies |
DISM & H, WHO, Govt. of India, 2001-2002 |
|||||||
|
19. Status |
Chhattisgarh |
Madhya Pradesh |
||||||
|
- CITES |
- |
|||||||
|
- Legislation |
- |
|||||||
|
- Criteria
based on |
VU (A 2 c, d) |
- |
||||||
|
- IUCN |
VU |
- |
||||||
|
20. % of global presence |
< 1 % |
- |
||||||
|
21. Existing Conservation measures |
-
|
|||||||
|
22. Is the presence of taxon
continuous with neighbouring areas ? |
Yes
|
|||||||
|
23. Are the outside
populations also under similar threats / pressures? |
Yes
|
|||||||
|
24. Recommendations |
Habitat
conservation to be taken |
|||||||
|
Research / Management |
||||||||
|
a) in situ |
- |
|||||||
|
b) ex situ |
Propagation
studies to be taken |
|||||||
|
i)
Cultivation |
- |
|||||||
|
ii)
Level of difficulty in propagation / cultivation |
2
(Moderately difficult) |
|||||||
|
25. Existing cultivation- |
- |
|||||||
|
26. Previous assessment |
By
DISM & H, WHO, Govt. of India, 2001-02 |
|||||||
|
27. Data sources (Including literature) |
·
Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Govt. of India ·
DISM & H, WHO, Demand study for selected medicinal plants,
2001-2002 |
|||||||
|
28. Compilers |
S. N. Khotele (Facilitator), Omkar Lal
Shrivastava, R. K. Pandey, Pushp Jain, Ruby Sharma, J. P. Sharma,
Shweta Singh (Recorder), R. K. S. Tiwari, R. Vijaya Sankar, Vinay
Tandon |
|||||||
|
29. Reviewers |
Plenary |
|||||||