|
1. Botanical name |
Asparagus recemosus Willd. |
|||||||
|
2. Synonym(s) |
Asparagus
officinalis
L. Asparagus
jacquemonti
Baker. |
|||||||
|
3. Family |
Liliaceae
|
|||||||
|
4. Taxonomic status |
Species |
|||||||
|
5. Vernacular names |
Satawar
(H), Shataori, Satamuli (S) |
|||||||
|
6. Habit |
Climbing
shrub |
|||||||
|
7. Habitat |
Outskirts
of forests; as undergrowth in mixed and open forest |
|||||||
|
8. Original global distribution |
Africa,
India, Malaysia, Australia |
|||||||
|
9. Current regional distribution |
Chhattisgarh |
Widely
distributed |
||||||
|
Madhya
Pradesh |
Widely
distributed |
|||||||
|
10. Elevation range (m) |
150
- 1300 |
|||||||
|
11. Population
Reduction – PR
|
States
|
<
30% |
30
to 49% |
50
to < 80% |
³
80% |
|||
|
Chhattisgarh |
ü |
|
|
|
||||
|
Madhya
Pradesh |
ü |
|
|
|
||||
|
Data quality |
2,
3, 4
|
|||||||
|
11 a. Time/Rate (years/generations) |
3
generations |
|||||||
|
12. Extent of Occurrence –
EOO |
20,000Km2
|
|||||||
|
13. Area of Occupancy –
AOO |
2,000Km2 |
|||||||
|
14. No. of locations / sub-populations |
Chhattisgarh |
Madhya Pradesh |
||||||
|
Wide spread |
Wide spread |
|||||||
|
14 a. Data quality |
2,
3, 4
|
|||||||
|
15. Threats |
Hf
(Harvest for food), Hm (Harvest for medicine), Lf (Loss of Habitat -
Fragmentation), Lp (Loss of habitat – Quality), T (Trade) |
|||||||
|
16. Trade |
Name(s) |
Satawar
|
||||||
|
Level(s) |
Local
ü |
Regional
ü |
National
ü |
Global
ü |
||||
|
Parts
traded |
Root
|
|||||||
|
Effect
on population |
Declining |
|||||||
|
Data
quality |
2,
3, 4
|
|||||||
|
17. Other comments |
|
|||||||
|
18. Recent field studies |
§
Sahu & I. Sahu, 1999. Ethnobotany §
Sahu & P. Sahu. Journal of Tropical Medicinal Plants
(CEDMAP) |
|||||||
|
19. Status |
Chhattisgarh |
Madhya Pradesh |
||||||
|
- CITES |
- |
|||||||
|
- Legislation |
- |
|||||||
|
- Criteria
based on |
NT
(A 2 c, d) |
NT
(A 2 c, d) |
||||||
|
- IUCN |
NT |
NT |
||||||
|
20. % of global presence |
10 % |
|
||||||
|
21. Existing Conservation measures |
-
|
|||||||
|
22. Is the presence of
taxon continuous with neighbouring areas ? |
Yes
|
|||||||
|
23. Are the outside
populations also under similar threats / pressures? |
Yes
|
|||||||
|
24. Recommendations |
S
(Survey, search & find), Hm (Habitat management), Lm (Limiting factor management) |
|||||||
|
Research / Management |
||||||||
|
a) in situ |
|
|||||||
|
b) ex situ |
|
|||||||
|
i)
Cultivation |
|
|||||||
|
ii)
Level of difficulty in propagation / cultivation |
1
(Least difficult) |
|||||||
|
25. Existing cultivation- |
|
|||||||
|
26. Previous assessment |
|
|||||||
|
27. Data sources (Including literature) |
§
Sahu & I. Sahu, 1999. Ethnobotany §
Sahu & P. Sahu. Journal of Tropical Medicinal Plants
(CEDMAP) |
|||||||
|
28. Compilers |
Anjali Rawat (Recorder), A. K.
Bhattacharya, S. J. Chipde, D. K. Ved K. K.
Khanna, A. K. Kulshrestha, Manish Mishra, Suprava Patnaik, Manisha Alice Lakra, Nagar, T. R. Sahu
(Facilitator), B. Saluja |
|||||||
|
29. Reviewers |
Ajay K. Awasthi, Arvind Anil Boaz, P.
Bhattacharya, Pankaj Oudhia, Brajesh Kumar Sahu, Krishna Patra,
G.A. Kinhal, Vinay K. Sinha, S. S. Chandravanshi |
|||||||