Species (& synonyms) |
Raphidophora pertusa (Roxb.)Schott = R.
laciniata (Burm.f.) Merr. |
||
Vernacular name |
Dodda thippali (Kan.); Anai thippili, Gaja thippili (Mal.); Anai pirandai (Tam.) |
||
Family |
ARACEAE |
||
Taxonomic status |
Species |
||
Habit |
Large epiphytic climber |
||
Habitat |
Deciduous to evergreen forests. |
||
Original global
distribution |
Southern India and Sri Lanka |
||
Current regional
distribution |
Karnataka, Kerala and Tamil Nadu |
||
- Elevation (m) |
500 - 1,700 |
||
- Range (km2) |
<
10,000 (KA) |
<
2,500 (KL) |
>
20,000 (TN) |
- Area occupied (km2) |
<
1,000 (KA) |
<
500 (KL) |
<
2,000 (TN) |
- No. of locations |
Many (KA) |
Many (KL) |
Many (TN) |
Population Trends |
|
||
- % decline |
>
20 (KA) |
<
10 (KL) |
<
20 (TN) |
- Time/Rate (years or
generations) |
10 years |
||
- No. of mature individuals |
<
1,000 (KA) |
<
3,000 (KL) |
<
3,000 (TN) |
Global population |
Not assessed |
||
Regional population |
Declining |
||
Data quality |
General
field studies, informal sightings, indirect observation, literature and
herbarium data. |
||
Recent field studies |
M.D.Subash
Chandran (1996), Uttara Kannada; K.Ravikumar, G.S.Goraya, P.S.Udayan,
S.P.Subramani (1996), Charmady, Agumbe and Subramanya MPCAs (KA). N.Mohanan (1995),
Agasthiarmalai; C.R.Jawahar (1992), Agasthiarmalai; K.Ravikumar (1995),
Munnar; M.Sivadasan (1975-96), Idukki Dist.; A.E.Shanawaz Khan (1994), entire
Thiruvananthapuram, Pathanamthitta and Idukki Dists.; P.S.Udayan (1997-98),
Kulamavu, Moozhikkal, Nilakkal (KL).
V.S.Ramachandran (1998), Anamalais; K.Ravikumar (1983-97), Kodaikanal,
Kallar, Tirunelveli, Thenmalai MPCA; John Jebaraj (1993-98), Vanthirtham,
Papanasam, Tirunelveli; D.Stephen (1994), Mudumalai; M.B.Viswanathan (1995),
Kolli hills (TN). |
||
Threats |
Harvest
for food (Hf), Harvest for medicine (Hm), Loss of habitat (L), Trade of parts
(Tp). |
||
Trade |
Local, commercial. |
||
Other comments |
Inflorescence
is in trade. One of the ingredients in Ayurvedic medicine. According to
M.Sivadasan, R. pertusa is distinct
and not a synonym of R. lacinata as
treated by Saldanha. Often as an ornamental use. It is predominantly seen
climbing on riparian trees. Propagation through stem cutting is successful.
Proportion global population in Tamil Nadu < 5%. |
||
Status |
|
||
- IUCN |
VU (KA) |
LRlc (KL) |
LRnt - LRlc (TN) |
- Criteria based on |
Population reduction (A1a.c) – KA |
||
- CITES |
No |
||
- IWPA (1972; 91) |
No |
||
- National legialation |
Not in negative list of exports
(Notification 2 (RE-98) dt 13.4.98, 1997-2002) |
||
Recommendations |
|
||
- Research management |
Monitoring
(M), Habitat management (Hm), Trade studies (O). |
||
- P.H.V.A. |
No |
||
Cultivation prog.
recommendations |
|
||
- Cultivation |
Level 2 (ex-situ) |
||
- Level of difficulty |
Level 1 (Least difficult) |
||
Existing cultivation |
Yes |
||
- Names of facilities |
Introduced
in many gardens, house yards, and research institutions for ornamental
purpose. |
||
Previous assessment |
VU (Regionally) & DD
(Globally) in CAMP –III (Jan.‘97) compiled by M.Sivadasan, K.R.Keshava Murthy,
V.S.Ramachandran, V.Chelladurai, G.S.Goraya, N.Loganathan, Meera Iyer. |
||
Sources |
P.S.Udayan,
A.E.Shanawaz Khan, K.Ravikumar, M.Sivadasan, M.D.Subash Chandran, N.Mohanan,
C.R.Jawahar, V.S.Ramachandran, John Jebaraj, M.B.Viswanathan, D.Stephen
(persn. observn.). |
||
Compilers |
M.Abdul
Kareem, M.Ahmedullah, T.Ananda Rao, N.Anil Kumar, Anjali Wadehra, Anjana
Mudappa, S.Aroumougame, S.S.R.Bennet, Dasappa, J.L.Ellis, K.R.Geetha,
R.Gopalan, B.Gurudev Singh, V.P.Hiremath, V.Irudayaraj, Jagat Ram,
C.R.Jawahar, P.John Jebaraj, C.G.Kushalappa, Mohan Karnat, N.Mohanan,
K.N.Murthy, D.Narasimhan, M.P.Nayar, S.Noorunnisa Begum, A.G.Pandurangan,
V.Prabhakaran, V.S.Ramachandran, S.R.Ramesh, K.Ravikumar, Sanjay Molur,
N.Sasidharan, A.E.Shanawaz Khan, C.Seema, Y.N.Seetharam, B.V.Shetty,
B.S.Somashekhar, T.S.Srinivasa Murthy, D.Stephen, Subhash Mali,
S.P.Subramani, T.S.Suma, Sumy Oommen, D.Suresh Baburaj, M.H.Swaminath,
P.S.Udayan, D.K.Ved, Vinay Tandon, M.B.Viswanathan. |