|
1. Botanical name |
Baliospermum montanum (Willd.) Muell. - Arg. |
|||||||
|
2. Synonym(s) |
Baliospermum
axillare
Blume Jatropha
Montana Willd. |
|||||||
|
3. Family |
Euphorbiacea
|
|||||||
|
4. Taxonomic status |
Species |
|||||||
|
5. Vernacular names |
Danti
|
|||||||
|
6. Habit |
Shrub |
|||||||
|
7. Habitat |
Tropical
dry and deciduous forest |
|||||||
|
8. Original global distribution |
Paleotropic
|
|||||||
|
9. Current regional distribution |
Chhattisgarh |
Widely
distributed |
||||||
|
Madhya
Pradesh |
Widely
distributed |
|||||||
|
10. Elevation range (m) |
200
– 1000 |
|||||||
|
11. Population
Reduction – PR
|
States
|
<
30% |
30
to 49% |
50
to < 80% |
³
80% |
|||
|
Chhattisgarh |
ü |
|
|
|
||||
|
Madhya
Pradesh |
ü |
|
|
|
||||
|
Data quality |
3,
4
|
|||||||
|
11 a. Time/Rate (years/generations) |
3
generations |
|||||||
|
12. Extent of Occurrence –
EOO |
>20,000Km2
|
|||||||
|
13. Area of Occupancy –
AOO |
>2,000Km2 |
|||||||
|
14. No. of locations / sub-populations |
Chhattisgarh |
Madhya Pradesh |
||||||
|
Many |
Many |
|||||||
|
14 a. Data quality |
3,
4
|
|||||||
|
15. Threats |
Hm
(Harvest for medicine), L (Loss of Habitat), Tp (Traded for parts) |
|||||||
|
16. Trade |
Name(s) |
Danti
mul
|
||||||
|
Level(s) |
Local
|
Regional
ü |
National
ü |
Global
|
||||
|
Parts
traded |
Leaves,
Latex, Root, Seeds
|
|||||||
|
Effect
on population |
Declining |
|||||||
|
Data
quality |
3,
4
|
|||||||
|
17. Other comments |
The
roots are sold, therefore, the depletion of this species is very fast |
|||||||
|
18. Recent field studies |
§
K. Ravi kumar & Ved, 2000. §
Tiwari, et.al. 2003.
Propagation method – Report |
|||||||
|
19. Status |
Chhattisgarh |
Madhya Pradesh |
||||||
|
- CITES |
- |
|||||||
|
- Legislation |
- |
|||||||
|
- Criteria
based on |
NT (A 2 c, d) |
NT (A 2 c, d) |
||||||
|
- IUCN |
NT |
NT |
||||||
|
20. % of global presence |
< 1 % |
< 1 % |
||||||
|
21. Existing Conservation measures |
-
|
|||||||
|
22. Is the presence of
taxon continuous with neighbouring areas ? |
Yes
|
|||||||
|
23. Are the outside
populations also under similar threats / pressures? |
Yes
|
|||||||
|
24. Recommendations |
Multiplication,
Introduction in protected forest area, Experiments on methods of propagation |
|||||||
|
Research / Management |
||||||||
|
a) in situ |
|
|||||||
|
b) ex situ |
|
|||||||
|
i)
Cultivation |
|
|||||||
|
ii)
Level of difficulty in propagation / cultivation |
1
(Least difficult) |
|||||||
|
25. Existing cultivation- |
- |
|||||||
|
26. Previous assessment |
- |
|||||||
|
27. Data sources (Including literature) |
§
K. Ravi kumar & Ved, 2000. §
Tiwari, et.al. 2003.
Propagation method – Report |
|||||||
|
28. Compilers |
Ajay K. Awasthi, Arvind Anil Boaz
(Facilitator), P. Bhattacharya, Brajesh Kumar Sahu, S.S. Chandravanshi,
Krishna Patra (Recorder), G. A. Kinhal, Pankaj Oudhia, Vinay K.
Sinha |
|||||||
|
29. Reviewers |
S. N. Khotele, Omkar Lal Shrivastava, R.
K. Pandey, Pushp Jain, Ruby Sharma, J. P. Sharma, Shweta Singh, R. K. S.
Tiwari, R. Vijaya Sankar, Vinay Tandon |
|||||||