|
1. Botanical name |
Hippophae rhamnoides L. |
||||||||||
|
2. Synonym(s) |
- |
||||||||||
|
3. Family |
Elaeagnaceae
|
||||||||||
|
4. Taxonomic status |
Species
|
||||||||||
|
5. Vernacular names |
Chharma,
Sarila, Tirku, Amli, Sarma |
||||||||||
|
6. Habit |
Shrub
/ small tree |
||||||||||
|
7. Habitat |
Common
on glacial streams, North East Himalayas, inner dry regions; Moist
sloppy areas in riverbed and fresh alluvial soil |
||||||||||
|
8. Original global distribution |
Afghanistan,
India, Nepal, China, Temperate Asia, North & Middle Europe |
||||||||||
|
9. Current regional distribution |
Himachal Pradesh |
Lahaul
& Spiti, Kinnaur |
|||||||||
|
Jammu & Kashmir |
Hemmins protected area |
||||||||||
|
Uttaranchal |
Not specified |
||||||||||
|
10. Elevation range (m) |
|
||||||||||
|
11. Population
Reduction – PR |
States
|
<
30% |
30
to <49% |
50
to < 80% |
³
80% |
||||||
|
Himachal Pradesh |
- |
ü |
|
|
|||||||
|
Jammu & Kashmir |
- |
ü |
|
|
|||||||
|
Uttaranchal |
ü |
- |
|
|
|||||||
|
Data quality |
2,
3
|
||||||||||
|
11 a. Time/Rate
(years/generations) |
10
years |
||||||||||
|
12. Extent of Occurrence –
EOO |
>20, 000 Km2
|
||||||||||
|
13. Area of Occupancy –
AOO |
> 2,000 Km2 |
||||||||||
|
14. No. of locations / sub-populations |
Himachal Pradesh |
Jammu
& Kashmir |
Uttaranchal |
||||||||
|
Many |
Many |
6 |
|||||||||
|
14 a. Data quality |
3
|
||||||||||
|
15. Threats |
Ov
(Over exploitation), L (Loss of Habitat), T
(Trade) |
||||||||||
|
16. Trade |
Name(s) |
-
|
|||||||||
|
Level(s) |
Local
ü |
Regional
ü |
National
|
Global
|
|||||||
|
Parts traded |
-
|
||||||||||
|
Effect on population |
Declining
|
||||||||||
|
Data quality |
3 |
||||||||||
|
17. Other comments |
·
The species which occur in India is H. rhamnoides sub sp. Turkestanica
·
ISTARBU in folk medicine |
||||||||||
|
18. Recent field studies |
·
GHNP, ·
Dr. Nautiyal, Dr. P.B. Singh, Dr. Brijlal, Mr. B. S. Rana, Mr. B.C.
Thakur, Dr. M.V. Viswanatham (1994-98) |
||||||||||
19.
Status |
Himachal Pradesh |
Jammu & Kashmir |
Uttaranchal |
||||||||
|
- CITES |
- |
||||||||||
|
- Legislation |
- |
||||||||||
|
- Criteria based on |
A 2 c d |
A 2 c d |
A 2 c |
||||||||
|
- IUCN |
VU |
VU |
NT |
||||||||
|
20.
% of global presence |
2 – 5 % |
||||||||||
|
21.
Existing Conservation measures |
Found
with in the high altitudes Pas of Uttaranchal
|
||||||||||
|
22.
Is the presence of taxon continuous with neighbouring areas ? |
Yes
|
||||||||||
|
23.
Are the outside populations also under similar threats / pressures? |
Yes
|
||||||||||
|
24.
Recommendations |
Hm (Habitat management), Lh (Life history studies) |
||||||||||
|
Research / Management |
|||||||||||
|
a) in situ |
Jammu
&Kashmir – Hemmins Protected Area Himachal Pradesh – Shego, Attagu (Spiti Dt.), Barapa valley |
||||||||||
|
b) ex situ |
- |
||||||||||
|
i) Cultivation |
- |
||||||||||
|
ii) Level of difficulty in propagation / cultivation |
2
(Moderately difficult) |
||||||||||
|
25.
Existing cultivation |
- |
||||||||||
|
26.
Previous assessment |
NT
– J&K, HP (kullu, 1998) |
||||||||||
|
27.
Data sources (Including literature) |
HPSCSTE, SBT Task Force Report |
||||||||||
|
28.
Compilers |
Rekha Naithani, N.K. Bhardwaj, Kailash Sharma, R.
K. Verma, Vaneet Jishtu, Rajender Kumar, Ranjit Rawat (Recorder), N. S. Chauhan
(Facilitator), Vinay Tandon, H. K. Badola |
||||||||||
|
29.
Reviewers |
H. B. Naithani, S. S. Samant, M. C. Nautiyal, V.
P. Bhat, S. K. Murti, G. A. Kinhal, R. Vijaya Sankar |
||||||||||