1. Botanical name |
Meconopis aculeata Royle |
|||||||||||
2. Synonym(s) |
- |
|||||||||||
3. Family |
Papaveraceae
|
|||||||||||
4. Taxonomic status |
Species
|
|||||||||||
5. Vernacular names |
Tsher
– Sngon (Tibetian) |
|||||||||||
6. Habit |
Herb
|
|||||||||||
7. Habitat |
Grows
in higher altitude in eastern part, Moraines cliffs, Rocky region, Boulders.
Endemic to W. Himalaya with restricted distribution. |
|||||||||||
8. Original global distribution |
Afghanistan,
Pakistan, India |
|||||||||||
9. Current regional distribution |
Himachal Pradesh |
Kullu
(5), Kinnaur (4), Chamba (3), Lahual-Spiti (3), Rohtang, GHNP, Sagnla, Moral
danda, Churdhar |
||||||||||
Jammu & Kashmir |
Chandanbadi,
Madwa |
|||||||||||
Uttaranchal |
Valley of
flowers |
|||||||||||
10. Elevation range (m) |
2,400
to 4,700 |
|||||||||||
11. Population
Reduction – PR |
States
|
<
30% |
30
to <49% |
50
to < 80% |
³
80% |
|||||||
Himachal Pradesh |
|
|
|
ü |
||||||||
Jammu & Kashmir |
|
|
ü |
|
||||||||
Uttaranchal |
|
ü |
|
|
||||||||
Global |
|
|
ü |
|
||||||||
Data quality |
2
|
|||||||||||
11 a. Time/Rate
(years/generations) |
10
years |
|||||||||||
12. Extent of Occurrence –
EOO |
>20, 000 Km2
|
|||||||||||
13. Area of Occupancy –
AOO |
> 2,000 Km2 |
|||||||||||
14. No. of locations / sub-populations |
Himachal Pradesh |
Jammu
& Kashmir |
Uttaranchal |
|||||||||
Many |
10 |
Many |
||||||||||
14 a. Data quality |
3
|
|||||||||||
15. Threats |
Hm
(Harvest for medicine), Lf (Loss of Habitat), T (Trade) |
|||||||||||
16. Trade |
Name(s) |
Patishan
Rooli
|
||||||||||
Level(s) |
Local
ü |
Regional
ü |
National
ü |
Global
|
||||||||
Parts traded |
Roots
|
|||||||||||
Effect on population |
Declining
|
|||||||||||
Data quality |
3 |
|||||||||||
17. Other comments |
Common
Blue Poppy has its use in Tibetan Medicine Roots
contain xanthotoxin |
|||||||||||
18. Recent field studies |
N.S. Chauhan, 1992, Ravikumar and Suma, 2000 |
|||||||||||
19.
Status |
Himachal Pradesh |
Jammu & Kashmir |
Uttaranchal |
|||||||||
- CITES |
- |
|||||||||||
- Legislation |
- |
|||||||||||
- Criteria based on |
CR (A 2 c, d) |
EN (A 2 c, d) |
VU (A 2 c, d) |
|||||||||
- IUCN |
EN (G) |
|||||||||||
20.
% of global presence |
60 – 70 % |
|||||||||||
21.
Existing Conservation measures |
Found
with in the high altitude PAs of Uttaranchal
|
|||||||||||
22.
Is the presence of taxon continuous with neighbouring areas ? |
-
|
|||||||||||
23.
Are the outside populations also under similar threats / pressures? |
-
|
|||||||||||
24.
Recommendations |
Hm (Habitat management), S (Survey), M
(Monitoring), Lr (Limited resource management) |
|||||||||||
Research / Management |
||||||||||||
a) in situ |
Jammu &Kashmir – Chandanbadi, Madwa; Himachal Pradesh – Rohtang,
Mani Mahesh, Mural danda, Parvath valley; Uttaranchal – Valley of flowers |
|||||||||||
b) ex situ |
- |
|||||||||||
i) Cultivation |
- |
|||||||||||
ii) Level of difficulty in propagation / cultivation |
2
(Moderately difficult) |
|||||||||||
25.
Existing cultivation- |
- |
|||||||||||
26.
Previous assessment |
EN-JMK,
VU-HP (Kullu CAMP) |
|||||||||||
27.
Data sources (Including literature) |
Survey report (unpublished) by N.S. Chauhan,
Chamba S.K. Singh and G.S. Rawat, 1998. long term
monitoring vegetation in GHNP |
|||||||||||
28.
Compilers |
Rekha Naithani, N.K. Bhardwaj, Kailash Sharma, R.
K. Verma, Vaneet Jishtu, Rajender Kumar, Ranjit Rawat (Recorder), N. S.
Chauhan (Facilitator), Vinay Tandon, H. K. Badola |
|||||||||||
29.
Reviewers |
H. B. Naithani, S. S. Samant, M. C. Nautiyal, V.
P. Bhat, S. K. Murti, G. A. Kinhal, R. Vijaya Sankar |
|||||||||||