1. Botanical name |
Pleurospermum angelicoides (DC)
Clarke |
||||||||||
2. Synonym(s) |
Hymenolaena
angelicoides DC Pterocyclus
angelicoides (Wall.) Klotzsch |
||||||||||
3. Family |
Apiaceae
|
||||||||||
4. Taxonomic status |
Species |
||||||||||
5. Vernacular names |
- |
||||||||||
6. Habit |
Herb |
||||||||||
7. Habitat |
Occasionally
found along rocks and open slopes |
||||||||||
8. Original global distribution |
W.
Himalaya |
||||||||||
9. Current regional distribution |
Himachal
Pradesh |
Beas
kund, chhakmala (Kullu) |
|||||||||
Jammu
& Kashmir |
Not
recorded |
||||||||||
Uttaranchal |
Garhwal,
Kumaon, Latakharak, Pindari, Askot, Dudhatoli |
||||||||||
10. Elevation range (m) |
2,500
– 4,000 |
||||||||||
11. Population
Reduction – PR
|
States
|
<
30% |
30
to 49% |
50
to < 80% |
³
80% |
||||||
Himachal
Pradesh |
DD |
||||||||||
Jammu
& Kashmir |
|
- |
|
|
|||||||
Uttaranchal |
|
ü |
|
|
|||||||
Data quality |
|
||||||||||
11 a. Time/Rate (years/generations) |
10
years |
||||||||||
12. Extent of Occurrence –
EOO |
> 20,000 Km2
|
||||||||||
13. Area of Occupancy –
AOO |
> 2,000 Km2 |
||||||||||
14. No. of locations / sub-populations |
Himachal Pradesh |
Jammu
& Kashmir |
Uttaranchal |
||||||||
2 |
- |
4 |
|||||||||
14 a. Data quality |
2,
3
|
||||||||||
15. Threats |
Hm
(Harvest for medicine) |
||||||||||
16. Trade |
Name(s) |
Chhipi
|
|||||||||
Level(s) |
Local
ü |
Regional
|
National
|
Global
|
|||||||
Parts
traded |
Root
|
||||||||||
Effect
on population |
Declining |
||||||||||
Data
quality |
2,
4 |
||||||||||
17. Other comments |
§
Taxonomic identity and population studies need to be undertaken |
||||||||||
18. Recent field studies |
§
D.S. Dhelimal and M. Sharma, 1999 §
Samant et.al. 1997 |
||||||||||
19. Status |
Himachal Pradesh |
Jammu & Kashmir |
Uttaranchal |
||||||||
- CITES
|
- |
||||||||||
- Legislation |
- |
||||||||||
- Criteria
based on |
DD
|
- |
VU
(A 2 c,d) |
||||||||
- IUCN |
DD |
- |
VU |
||||||||
20. % of global presence |
10 – 20 % |
||||||||||
21. Existing Conservation measures |
Cultivated
in Garpap, Nandadevi
|
||||||||||
22. Is the presence of taxon
continuous with neighbouring areas ? |
Yes
|
||||||||||
23. Are the outside
populations also under similar threats / pressures ? |
Yes
|
||||||||||
24. Recommendations |
S
(Survey, search and find), M (Monitoring), Lh (Life history studies) (Beas
kund, Chhakinala and surrounding areas) |
||||||||||
Research / Management |
Propagation
studies |
||||||||||
a) in situ |
- |
||||||||||
b) ex situ |
- |
||||||||||
i)
Cultivation |
- |
||||||||||
ii)
Level of difficulty in propagation / cultivation |
- |
||||||||||
25. Existing cultivation- |
- |
||||||||||
26. Previous assessment |
- |
||||||||||
27. Data sources (Including literature) |
§
D.S. Dhelimal and M. Sharma, 1999 §
Samant et.al, 1997 §
Samant & Dhar, 1997 |
||||||||||
28. Compilers |
Rekha Naithani, N.K. Bhardwaj, Kailash Sharma, R.
K. Verma, Vaneet Jishtu, Rajender Kumar, Ranjit Rawat (Recorder), N. S. Chauhan (Facilitator), Vinay Tandon, H. K.
Badola |
||||||||||
29. Reviewers |
H.
B. Naithani, S. S. Samant, V. P. Bhat, M. C. Nautiyal, S. K. Murti, G. A.
Kinhal, R. Vijaya Sankar |
||||||||||