1. Botanical name |
Caesalpinia digyna Rottler |
|||||||
2. Synonym(s) |
- |
|||||||
3. Family |
Caesalpiniaceae
|
|||||||
4. Taxonomic status |
Species |
|||||||
5. Vernacular names |
Wakharimool
/ Teripod |
|||||||
6. Habit |
Shrub
|
|||||||
7. Habitat |
Sparse
vegetation, rocky areas, open space |
|||||||
8. Original global distribution |
Tropical,
Sub tropical Asia |
|||||||
9. Current regional distribution |
Chhattisgarh |
Bastar |
||||||
Madhya
Pradesh |
- |
|||||||
10. Elevation range (m) |
300
– 800 |
|||||||
11. Population
Reduction – PR
|
States
|
<
30% |
30
to 49% |
50
to < 80% |
³
80% |
|||
Chhattisgarh |
|
ü |
|
|
||||
Madhya
Pradesh |
|
|
|
|
||||
Data quality |
2,
3, 4
|
|||||||
11 a. Time/Rate (years/generations) |
3
generations |
|||||||
12. Extent of Occurrence –
EOO |
>20,000Km2
|
|||||||
13. Area of Occupancy –
AOO |
>2,000Km2 |
|||||||
14. No. of locations / sub-populations |
Chhattisgarh |
Madhya Pradesh |
||||||
Fragmented |
|
|||||||
14 a. Data quality |
2,
3, 4
|
|||||||
15. Threats |
Hm
(Harvest for medicine), Sd (Drought), Sf (Fire), Tp (Traded for parts) |
|||||||
16. Trade |
Name(s) |
Wakhari
mool
|
||||||
Level(s) |
Local
ü |
Regional
ü |
National
ü |
Global
|
||||
Parts
traded |
Pods
& Roots
|
|||||||
Effect
on population |
Declining
(30% decrease in last 10 years & 50% predicting decrease in future 10
years) |
|||||||
Data
quality |
2,
3, 4
|
|||||||
17. Other comments |
Decreasing
at faster rate, needs proper conservative measures and immediate attention |
|||||||
18. Recent field studies |
Oudhia, P, 2003. (Personal communication.).
www.botanical.com |
|||||||
19. Status |
Chhattisgarh |
Madhya Pradesh |
||||||
- CITES |
|
|||||||
- Legislation |
|
|||||||
- Criteria
based on |
A 4 c, d |
A 4 c, d |
||||||
- IUCN |
VU |
VU |
||||||
20. % of global presence |
<10% |
<1% |
||||||
21. Existing Conservation measures |
Nil
|
|||||||
22. Is the presence of
taxon continuous with neighbouring areas ? |
Yes
|
|||||||
23. Are the outside
populations also under similar threats / pressures? |
Yes
|
|||||||
24. Recommendations |
Hm
(Habitat management) |
|||||||
Research / Management |
||||||||
a) in situ |
Sukma,
Machkot and Dantewada |
|||||||
b) ex situ |
|
|||||||
i)
Cultivation |
|
|||||||
ii)
Level of difficulty in propagation / cultivation |
2
(Moderately difficult) |
|||||||
25. Existing cultivation- |
Nil
|
|||||||
26. Previous assessment |
Nil
|
|||||||
27. Data sources (Including literature) |
Oudhia, P, 2003. (Personal communication.). www.botanical.com Second supplement to glossary of Indian Medicinal
plants with active principles – Part I |
|||||||
28. Compilers |
|
|||||||
29. Reviewers |
|
|||||||