1. Botanical name |
Curcuma caesia Roxb. |
|||||||
2. Synonym(s) |
- |
|||||||
3. Family |
Zingiberaceae
|
|||||||
4. Taxonomic status |
Species |
|||||||
5. Vernacular names |
Kali-Haldi,
Kariya Haldi, Narkachura |
|||||||
6. Habit |
Herb
(Rhizomatous) |
|||||||
7. Habitat |
Hilly
moist shady area |
|||||||
8. Original global distribution |
India
(East and North East India, West Bengal) |
|||||||
9. Current regional distribution |
Chhattisgarh |
Bastar,
Sarguja, Bilaspur, Raigarh |
||||||
Madhya
Pradesh |
Amarkantak,
Mandla |
|||||||
10. Elevation range (m) |
300
– 800 |
|||||||
11. Population Reduction
– PR
|
States
|
<
30% |
30
to 49% |
50
to < 80% |
³
80% |
|||
Chhattisgarh |
|
|
|
|
||||
Madhya
Pradesh |
|
|
|
|
||||
Data quality |
2,
3, 4
|
|||||||
11 a. Time/Rate (years/generations) |
10
years |
|||||||
12. Extent of Occurrence –
EOO |
> 20,000 Km2
|
|||||||
13. Area of Occupancy –
AOO |
> 2,000 Km2 |
|||||||
14. No. of locations / sub-populations |
Chhattisgarh |
Madhya Pradesh |
||||||
|
|
|||||||
14 a. Data quality |
2,
3, 4
|
|||||||
15. Threats |
Hm
(Harvest for medicine), Lp (Loss of Habitat - Quality), T (Trade) |
|||||||
16. Trade |
Name(s) |
Kali
Haldi
|
||||||
Level(s) |
Local
ü |
Regional
ü |
National
ü |
Global
|
||||
Parts
traded |
Rhizome
|
|||||||
Effect
on population |
Declining |
|||||||
Data
quality |
2,
3, 4
|
|||||||
17. Other comments |
·
This species extensively occurs in NE states. Intensive studies have
been made leading to recognition of seven strains / varieties of the species depending
upon the extent of dark colour on the leaf and in the rhizome ·
Its presence in ‘wild’ is reported only in WB. It is often cultivated
(Wealth of Asia, 1994). As the wild presence is doubtful in MP & CG, the
threat status cannot be assessed. The presence of this species both in wild
or in cultivated form has not been reported in Flora of MP,. BSI, 2001. |
|||||||
18. Recent field studies |
Aditya Kumar Sharma, 2002. Ph. D thesis. IIFM,
Bhopal |
|||||||
19. Status |
Chhattisgarh |
Madhya Pradesh |
||||||
- CITES |
- |
|||||||
- Legislation |
- |
|||||||
- Criteria
based on |
DD |
DD |
||||||
- IUCN |
|
|
||||||
20. % of global presence |
Not estimated |
|||||||
21. Existing Conservation measures |
Nil
|
|||||||
22. Is the presence of taxon
continuous with neighbouring areas ? |
Yes
(Orissa, Jharkhand)
|
|||||||
23. Are the outside
populations also under similar threats / pressures? |
Yes
|
|||||||
24. Recommendations |
S
(Survey, search and find), M (Monitoring), Hm (Habitat management) |
|||||||
Research / Management |
||||||||
a) in situ |
Amarkantak,
Mandla, (M.P.) Abujmar
area of Bastar, Barsur, Pamed, Bacheli (Chhattisgarh) |
|||||||
b) ex situ |
- |
|||||||
i)
Cultivation |
- |
|||||||
ii)
Level of difficulty in propagation / cultivation |
1
(Least difficult) |
|||||||
25. Existing cultivation- |
Grown
in home gardens by Local Vaidyas |
|||||||
26. Previous assessment |
|
|||||||
27. Data sources (Including literature) |
S.S.
Bisen – Medicinal plants of central India |
|||||||
28. Compilers |
R. L. S. Sikarwar (Facilitator), Arti Gupta
(Recorder), Ashok K. Jain, N. Mohan Karnat, K. Ravikumar, Shahbaz
Ahmad, J. L. Shrivastava, Ashutosh Tripathi, Uttam Kumar Subuddhi |
|||||||
29. Reviewers |
Ajay K. Awasthi, Arvind Anil Boaz, P.
Bhattacharya, Pankaj Oudhia, Brajesh Kumar Sahu, Krishna Patra,
G.A. Kinhal, Vinay K. Sinha, S. S. Chandravanshi |
|||||||