1. Botanical name

Cinnamomum tamala (Buch-Ham) T. Nees & Eberm.

2. Synonym(s)

-

3. Family

Lauraceae

4. Taxonomic status

Species

5. Vernacular names

Tezpat (Assam), Tezpatta (Nepal), Lattipad (Khasi)

6. Habit

Tree

7. Habitat

Tropical and Sub tropical forests

8. Original global distribution

 

Through out Himalayas - India, Nepal, Bhutan, Myanmar,

9. Current

regional

distribution

 

Ar. Pradesh

Pasi Ghat, East Siang Dt., Hunli Dt., Dibang valley

Assam

Tinsukia, Arunachal Pradesh border

Meghalaya

Khasi hills, Bangladesh border

Sikkim

East and South districts (Namchi)

10. Elevation range (m)

Up to  2,000

11. Population Reduction – PR

 

States \  Class

< 30%

30 to 49%

50 to < 80%

­³ 80%

Ar. Pradesh

 

ü

 

 

Assam

 

-

 

 

Meghalaya

 

ü

 

 

Sikkim

 

-

 

 

Data quality

-

11 a. Time/Rate (years/generations)

2 generations

12. Extent of Occurrence – EOO

> 20,000 Km2

13. Area of Occupancy – AOO 

> 2,000 Km2

14. No. of  locations / sub-populations 

Ar. Pradesh

Assam

Meghalaya

Sikkim

10 (scattered)

Many

> 6

1

14 a. Data quality

2

15. Threats 

Hm=Harvest for medicine, Hf= Harvest for food, Sf=Fire, L= Loss of habitat

16. Trade

 

Name(s)

Tezpatta

Level(s)

Local  ü

Regional ü

National ü

Global

Parts traded

Leaves, Bark

Impact on population

Not Known

Data quality

2

17. Other comments

§         Important spice

§         Natural forests are converted in to managed vegetation of this species

§         Unable to distinguish from the wild and cultivated population

18. Recent field studies

 

§         Borthakur, 1995. Not in wild. East Sikkim

§         M.S.Rawat and Ramashakar, 1999-2003. Pasi Ghat and Hunli (Arunachal Pradesh)

§         Dr. Manju, 1996-1997). Namchi (S Sikkim)

§         A.K. Ghosh, 2003. Khasi hills

§         S.K. Barik,  2002.

 

19. Status

Ar. Pradesh

Assam

Meghalaya

Sikkim

- CITES     

 

 

 

 

- Legislation

 

 

 

 

- Criteria based on

A 2 c,d

 

A 2 c,d

-

- IUCN

VU

DD

VU

DD

20. % of global presence

< 5 %

5-10 %

5-10 %

-

21. Existing Conservation measures

Nil

22. Is the presence of taxon continuous with neighboring areas ?

Yes

23. Are the outside populations also under similar threats / pressures ?

Not known due to cultivation

24. Recommendations

a) Research / Management

i)        in situ

ii) ex situ       

b)              Cultivation

c)               Level of difficulty in propagation / cultivation

 

Survey of wild population (S)

 

 

Abundant

1 (Least difficult)

25. Existing cultivation

Plenty

26. Previous assessment

Nil

27. Data sources (including literature)

All Regional Floras

 

28. Compilers

S.K. Borthakur (Facilitator), Pushpadhar Gogoi,

P.K. Dutta, P.C. Rai, Utkarsh Ghate (Recorder),

Pranab Bujarbarua P. J.  Bora, D. Mathur,  S. K. Barik,

M. Islam.

29. Reviewers

S.N. Hegde (Facilitator), L.R. Bhuyan, M.S. Rawat,

Manju Sundriyal, K. Ravikumar (Recorder),

M. Majumdar, K.C. Malakar, A. K Baishya, D.K. Ved.