1. Botanical name |
Costus speciosus (J. Koenig ex Retz.) Sm. |
|||||||
2. Synonym(s) |
Banksea
speciosa J.
Koenig |
|||||||
3. Family |
Costaceae
|
|||||||
4. Taxonomic status |
Species |
|||||||
5. Vernacular names |
Keokanda
|
|||||||
6. Habit |
Herb
|
|||||||
7. Habitat |
Sal
forests and deforested lands in shady places |
|||||||
8. Original global distribution |
India,
Sri Lanka, SE Asia, Africa, Australia |
|||||||
9. Current regional distribution |
Chhattisgarh |
Bastar,
Raigarh, Raipur, Sarguja, Rajnandgaon, Bilaspur |
||||||
Madhya
Pradesh |
Balaghat,
Hoshangabad, Damoh, Sidhi, Rewa, Mandla, Shevni, Dindori |
|||||||
10. Elevation range (m) |
200
– 1,000 |
|||||||
11. Population
Reduction – PR
|
States
|
<
30% |
30
to 49% |
50
to < 80% |
³
80% |
|||
Chhattisgarh |
|
ü |
|
|
||||
Madhya
Pradesh |
|
ü |
|
|
||||
Data quality |
3,
4
|
|||||||
11 a. Time/Rate (years/generations) |
10
years |
|||||||
12. Extent of Occurrence –
EOO |
>20,000Km2
|
|||||||
13. Area of Occupancy –
AOO |
>2,000Km2 |
|||||||
14. No. of locations / sub-populations |
Chhattisgarh |
Madhya Pradesh |
||||||
Wide distribution |
Wide distribution |
|||||||
14 a. Data quality |
3,
4
|
|||||||
15. Threats |
Hm
(Harvest for medicine), Tp (Traded for parts), Hf (Harvest for food), |
|||||||
16. Trade |
Name(s) |
Keo-kanda
|
||||||
Level(s) |
Local
ü |
Regional
ü |
National
ü |
Global
|
||||
Parts
traded |
Rhizome
|
|||||||
Effect
on population |
Declining |
|||||||
Data
quality |
3,
4
|
|||||||
17. Other comments |
Seed
formation become scanty due to early harvesting |
|||||||
18. Recent field studies |
Tiwari et.al.2002-03 Srivastava, O.L. & Sumita Srivastava, 1997-99 SFRI publication, 1990-2000 |
|||||||
19. Status |
Chhattisgarh |
Madhya Pradesh |
||||||
- CITES |
- |
|||||||
- Legislation |
- |
|||||||
- Criteria
based on |
VU
(A 2 c, d) |
VU
(A 2 c, d) |
||||||
- IUCN |
VU |
VU |
||||||
20. % of global presence |
< 5 % |
< 5 % |
||||||
21. Existing Conservation measures |
Nil
|
|||||||
22. Is the presence of
taxon continuous with neighbouring areas ? |
Yes
|
|||||||
23. Are the outside
populations also under similar threats / pressures? |
Yes
|
|||||||
24. Recommendations |
Multiplication
in protected area, Sustainable harvesting techniques, Seed biology, Growth
behavior |
|||||||
Research / Management |
||||||||
a) in situ |
Chhattisgarh
– Bagnadi (Rajnandgaon Dt.), Raigarh, Bastar Madhya
Pradesh - Mandla |
|||||||
b) ex situ |
|
|||||||
i)
Cultivation |
Experimentation
on agronomy as well as fertilizers |
|||||||
ii) Level
of difficulty in propagation / cultivation |
1
(Least difficult) |
|||||||
25. Existing cultivation- |
Yes
(<1%) |
|||||||
26. Previous assessment |
|
|||||||
27. Data sources (Including literature) |
·
Tiwari et.al.2002-03 ·
Srivastava, O.L. & Sumita
Srivastava, 1997-99 ·
SFRI publication, 1990-2000 ·
V. Mudgal, K.K. Khanna & D.K. Hajra (1997). Flora of Madhya
Pradesh, Vol. II, B.S.I. |
|||||||
28. Compilers |
S. N. Khotele (Facilitator), Omkar Lal
Shrivastava, R. K. Pandey, Pushp Jain, Ruby Sharma, J. P. Sharma,
Shweta Singh (Recorder), R. K. S. Tiwari, R. Vijaya Sankar, Vinay
Tandon |
|||||||
29. Reviewers |
Anjali Rawat, A. K. Bhattacharya, S. J.
Chipde, D. K. Ved K. K.
Khanna, A. K. Kulshrestha, Manish Mishra, Suprava Patnaik, Manisha Alice Lakra, Nagar, T. R. Sahu, B.
Saluja |
|||||||