|
1. Botanical name |
Urginea indica (Roxb.) Kunth |
|||||||
|
2. Synonym(s) |
Drimia
indica
(Roxb.) J.P. Jessop |
|||||||
|
3. Family |
Liliaceae
|
|||||||
|
4. Taxonomic status |
Species |
|||||||
|
5. Vernacular names |
Jangli
piyaz |
|||||||
|
6. Habit |
Herb
|
|||||||
|
7. Habitat |
Through
out moist zone, Tropical forest |
|||||||
|
8. Original global distribution |
India,
Asia, Africa |
|||||||
|
9. Current regional distribution |
Chhattisgarh |
Bastar,
Gondagaum, Rajnandgaon, Bilaspur, Ambikapur |
||||||
|
Madhya
Pradesh |
Dindori,
Mandla, Amarkatak, Matinala, Satna, Pachmari |
|||||||
|
10. Elevation range (m) |
300
– 1,500 |
|||||||
|
11. Population
Reduction – PR
|
States
|
<
30% |
30
to 49% |
50
to < 80% |
³
80% |
|||
|
Chhattisgarh |
|
ü |
|
|
||||
|
Madhya
Pradesh |
|
ü |
|
|
||||
|
Data quality |
3,
4
|
|||||||
|
11 a. Time/Rate (years/generations) |
10
years |
|||||||
|
12. Extent of Occurrence –
EOO |
< 20,000Km2
|
|||||||
|
13. Area of Occupancy –
AOO |
< 2,000Km2 |
|||||||
|
14. No. of locations / sub-populations |
Chhattisgarh |
Madhya Pradesh |
||||||
|
In all districts in moist
Sal forest |
In all districts in moist
Sal forest |
|||||||
|
14 a. Data quality |
3,
4
|
|||||||
|
15. Threats |
Hm
(Harvest for medicine), Lp (Loss of Habitat - Quality), Tp
(Traded for parts) |
|||||||
|
16. Trade |
Name(s) |
Jangli
piyaz
|
||||||
|
Level(s) |
Local
|
Regional
|
National
ü |
Global
|
||||
|
Parts
traded |
Bulb
|
|||||||
|
Effect
on population |
Declining |
|||||||
|
Data
quality |
3,
4
|
|||||||
|
17. Other comments |
Destructive
harvesting |
|||||||
|
18. Recent field studies |
Annual progress report, ICAR, 2002-2003 |
|||||||
|
19. Status |
Chhattisgarh |
Madhya Pradesh |
||||||
|
- CITES |
- |
|||||||
|
- Legislation |
National
-ve list of export |
|||||||
|
- Criteria
based on |
VU
(A 2 c, d) |
VU
(A 2 c, d) |
||||||
|
- IUCN |
VU |
VU |
||||||
|
20. % of global presence |
<1% |
<1% |
||||||
|
21. Existing Conservation measures |
-
|
|||||||
|
22. Is the presence of
taxon continuous with neighbouring areas ? |
Yes
|
|||||||
|
23. Are the outside
populations also under similar threats / pressures? |
Yes
|
|||||||
|
24. Recommendations |
Multiplication,
Sustainable management |
|||||||
|
Research / Management |
||||||||
|
a) in situ |
- |
|||||||
|
b) ex situ |
Tissue
culture, Propagation |
|||||||
|
i)
Cultivation |
- |
|||||||
|
ii)
Level of difficulty in propagation / cultivation |
2
(Moderately difficult) |
|||||||
|
25. Existing cultivation- |
- |
|||||||
|
26. Previous assessment |
- |
|||||||
|
27. Data sources (Including literature) |
Tiwari
et.al. 2002-2003 Pandey,
R.K. et.al.1993-1994 (SFRI) |
|||||||
|
28. Compilers |
S. N. Khotele (Facilitator), Omkar Lal
Shrivastava, R. K. Pandey, Pushp Jain, Ruby Sharma, J. P. Sharma,
Shweta Singh (Recorder), R. K. S. Tiwari, R. Vijaya Sankar, Vinay
Tandon |
|||||||
|
29. Reviewers |
Plenary |
|||||||