1. Botanical name |
Embelia ribes Burm. f. |
||||||||
2. Synonym(s) |
|
||||||||
3. Family |
Myrsinaceae |
||||||||
4. Taxonomic status |
Species |
||||||||
5. Vernacular names
|
Biring – guti, Biakol-lata (Assamese), Meika- e – jaonain (Synt) |
||||||||
6. Habit |
Liana |
||||||||
7. Habitat |
Grasslands, evergreen forests |
||||||||
8. Original global distribution |
India, Sri Lanka, Malaysia, S. China |
||||||||
9. Current regional distribution |
Ar.
Pradesh |
Itanagar, Kimin, Hunli, (Dibang valley) |
|||||||
Assam |
Upper Assam |
||||||||
Meghalaya |
Khasi, Jaintia |
||||||||
Sikkim |
Not recorded |
||||||||
10. Elevation range
(m) |
650-1,200 |
||||||||
11. Population Reduction – PR |
States \ Class
|
< 30% |
30 to 49% |
50 to < 80% |
³
80% |
||||
Ar. Pradesh |
? |
|
|
|
|||||
Assam |
|
|
|
|
|||||
Meghalaya |
|
|
|
|
|||||
Sikkim |
|
|
|
|
|||||
Data quality |
|
||||||||
11 a. Time/Rate
(years/generations) |
|
||||||||
12. Extent of Occurrence – EOO |
> 20,000 Km2 |
||||||||
13. Area of Occupancy – AOO |
> 2,000 Km2 |
||||||||
14. No. of locations / sub-populations |
Ar. Pradesh |
Assam |
Meghalaya |
Sikkim |
|||||
3 |
|
|
|
||||||
14 a. Data quality |
2, 3 |
||||||||
15. Threats |
T=Taded from Arunachal Pradesh Via Assam, L=Habitat loss,
Jhum cultivation, Agriculture expansion, Sf=Forest fire (Itanagar area). |
||||||||
16. Trade
|
Name(s) |
Biring – guti |
|||||||
Level(s) |
Local |
Regional |
National ü |
Global |
|||||
Parts traded |
Fruits |
||||||||
Impact on population |
Not Known |
||||||||
Data quality |
3 |
||||||||
17. Other comments |
Embelia floribunda is
adulterated with Embelia ribes. |
||||||||
18. Recent field
studies |
Borthakur, 1995 – 2002. Guwahati Market |
||||||||
19. Status |
Ar. Pradesh
|
Assam |
Meghalaya |
Sikkim |
|||||
- CITES |
|
|
|
|
|||||
- Legislation |
|
|
|
|
|||||
- Criteria based on |
|
|
|
|
|||||
- IUCN |
DD |
DD |
DD |
DD |
|||||
20. % of global
presence |
< 5% |
< 5% |
< 1% |
< 1% |
|||||
21. Existing Conservation measures |
Nil |
||||||||
22. Is the presence of taxon continuous with neighboring areas ? |
Yes |
||||||||
23. Are the outside populations also under similar threats / pressures ? |
Not known |
||||||||
24. Recommendations a) Research / Management i) in situ ü ii) ex situ b) Cultivation c) Level of difficulty in propagation / cultivation |
Survey of wild populations needed (S). Not known 3 (Very difficult) |
||||||||
25. Existing cultivation |
No |
||||||||
26. Previous assessment |
VU in Karnataka & Tamil Nadu, LR nt in Kerala (CAMP-Bangalore, 1998) |
||||||||
27. Data sources (including literature) |
§ U.N. Kanjkal Flora of Assam Vol. II. Govt. of Assam, 1934 § Haridasan & Rao 1987. Flora of Meghalaya |
||||||||
28. Compilers |
S.K. Borthakur (Facilitator), Pushpadhar Gogoi, P.K. Dutta, P.C. Rai, Utkarsh Ghate (Recorder), Pranab Bujarbarua, P. J. Bora, D. Mathur, S. K. Barik, M. Islam. |
||||||||
29. Reviewers |
S.N. Hegde (Facilitator), L.R. Bhuyan, M.S. Rawat, Manju Sundriyal, K. Ravikumar (Recorder), M. Majumdar, K.C. Malakar, A. K Baishya, D.K. Ved. |
||||||||